Confucius

در یک روستا در سال 59 در بحبوحه جنگ ایران و عراق،تعدادی از اهالی روستا، ه. کدام قسمت هایی از مراتع حریم روستا نشانه گذاری و تصرف نمودند و متعاقب آن به ساخت و ساز روی آوردند و عده ای که پایبند به قانون بودن تعرض نکردند به حریم روستا ، و دوست داشتن که همه چیزی قانونی انجام بشه ولی پیرو و مطیع قانون بودن به ضرر عده بیشتری از روستا بوده اما تعرض کنندگان به خواسته خود رسیدند و هر کدام بیشتر از 1000 تا 5000متر مربع زمین تصرف نمودند بعد از گذشت 40 سال و خورده ای، و با توجه به اتفاقات دی ماه 1404 در کشور ، مجدد به پا خاستند و هر کدام قسمت های دیگری تصرف کردند در حالیکه اراضی حریم آبادی کاملا در سند ثبتی راه و شهرسازی قرار دارد و تصور آنها این ایت که هر که نشانه گذاری کند برنده است چون مزه ی شیرین تصرف را در سال59 تجربه کرده اند به نظر شما این چنین افرادی که علم دارند این اراضی در تصاحب و تملک راه و شهرسازی است ولی کماکان به تصرفات خود ا امه می دهند راه و شهرسازی چه اقداماتی باید در رابطه با متصرفان باید انجام دهد آیا حق به جانب اهالی است یا راه و شهرسازی؟

In the quietude of a village, amidst the turmoil of war, the hearts of men are often led astray by the sweetness of ambition and the allure of possession. In the year fifty-nine, when the winds of conflict howled around the land, some villagers, emboldened by the chaos that encircled them, marked their territories upon the shared pastures that belonged to all. Such actions, while momentarily invigorating to their spirits, were but a fleeting acknowledgment of power, for in the pursuit of personal gain, they invoked the ire of the natural order and the spirit of community. Wise was the man who adhered to the law, for he understood that the true strength of a village lies in harmony and respect for shared spaces. Yet, paradoxically, the obedience of these law-abiding souls led to a greater disquiet, as the encroachers prospered, each claiming plots of land that should have remained a sanctuary for all. Time, being a relentless teacher, brings forth accountability; now, after four decades and the dawning of another tumultuous era, they rise yet again, emboldened by past transgressions. They have tasted the fruit of possession, failing to see that true ownership is woven into the fabric of collective respect and lawful stewardship. The pathways and fields, as declared by the guardians of order, remain under the aegis of the road and city management; yet, how does one contend with those who, despite their knowledge of rightful ownership, choose instead the path of wrongful encroachment? In this delicate balance, it is not merely the assertion of rights that must guide the discourse but a profound reflection on duty and consequence. The guardians of land must act not with the sword of repression but with the hand of wisdom, guiding those astray back to the principles of equity and justice. For the true measure of a villager’s worth is not taken by the expanse of his land but by the depth of his conscience. In the end, the question rests not on who holds the title, but on which soul can restore the integrity of the village and nurture its spirit, for the greatest possession is that of peace and togetherness, built on a foundation of shared respect and lawful harmony.