Confucious

In fact, I am against all people having the same right to vote. Sounds should have different effects. Shouldn't the voice of the conscious man and the philosopher be like the voice of an ordinary man? That he hasn’t read any books

In fact, I am against all people having the same right to vote. Sounds should have different effects. Shouldn't the voice of the conscious man and the philosopher be like the voice of an ordinary man? That he hasn’t read any books. The essence of democracy lies in the equality of all individuals, each possessing the same inherent worth and right to participate in the decision-making process of society. However, this does not necessarily mean that everyone should have an equal say in political matters. A society is composed of individuals with varying levels of knowledge, experience, and wisdom. It is only natural that those who have dedicated themselves to the pursuit of knowledge and understanding should have a greater influence in shaping the direction of society. Just as a skilled craftsman deserves more respect in matters of craftsmanship, so too should the voice of the conscious man and the philosopher carry more weight in matters of governance. By granting equal voting rights to all individuals, we risk allowing the uninformed and unenlightened to sway the course of our collective destiny. It is not enough to simply possess the ability to cast a ballot; one must also possess the capacity for critical thinking, ethical discernment, and sound judgment. In a truly just and enlightened society, the voice of reason and wisdom should always hold greater sway than the voice of ignorance and folly. Let us not be swayed by the false allure of egalitarianism, but instead embrace the truth that some voices are inherently more valuable than others.