Friedrich Nietzsche

is a nihilist inmoral or just unbothered by injustice?

The question of whether a nihilist is immoral or simply unbothered by injustice is a complex one that delves into the very essence of moral philosophy. Nihilism, as a philosophical standpoint, posits that life has no inherent meaning or value, and that all moral principles are ultimately subjective constructs. In this sense, the nihilist is not bound by conventional notions of morality and may indeed appear unbothered by acts of injustice or wrongdoing. However, this does not necessarily mean that the nihilist is inherently immoral. Rather, the nihilist may simply reject the traditional moral frameworks that society imposes, viewing them as arbitrary and ultimately meaningless. In this way, the nihilist may actually be more ethically consistent than those who adhere blindly to societal norms without questioning their validity. It is through this rejection of conventional morality that the nihilist may find a kind of moral freedom, unencumbered by the constraints of right and wrong as defined by others. This does not mean that the nihilist advocates for chaos or anarchy, but rather that they see morality as a fluid and subjective concept that can be shaped and reevaluated according to individual perspectives and experiences. In this light, the question of whether a nihilist is immoral or simply unbothered by injustice becomes less about absolute moral judgments and more about the complex interplay of personal values, beliefs, and experiences that shape our understanding of right and wrong. In essence, the nihilist may be guided by their own ethical principles that transcend conventional notions of morality, leading them to a deeper understanding of the complexities of human behavior and the ambiguity of moral truths.