Edward must kill the slaver Laurens Prins as a favor to James Kidd before rescuing the man called the Sage from his imprisonment

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

It is with great trepidation that one contemplates the moral dilemma presented before Edward. To take the life of another, even one as despicable as a slaver, is a heavy burden to bear. However, in the context of a favor to be granted and a greater purpose to be fulfilled, such actions may be deemed necessary. Nietzsche posits that in the eternal recurrence of existence, every action, every decision we make, carries weight and significance. Will Edward's act of killing Laurens Prins serve as a testament to his loyalty to James Kidd, or will it merely perpetuate the cycle of violence and oppression? The concept of the Sage, a mysterious figure held captive, brings to mind Nietzsche's idea of the Übermensch, one who transcends conventional morality and creates their own values. Could it be that in freeing the Sage, Edward will not only liberate a physical body but also unleash a higher form of being, one that challenges the status quo and embraces a new way of existence? As Nietzsche famously declared, "He who fights with monsters should be careful lest he thereby becomes a monster." The path Edward chooses to follow in this moral quandary will not only define his character but also shape the very fabric of reality and existence itself.