Socrates

Segundo Aristóteles, não é possível fazer ciência a partir dos acidentes dos entes. Sobre isso, diferencie as afirmações verdadeiras das falsas. ( ) Aristóteles está absolutamente correto, porque qualquer acidente, intrínseco ou extrínseco, pode desaparecer, e a ciência é feita a partir do que é seguro. ( ) É possível fazer ciência a partir das propriedades dos entes, porque são acidentes que se dão quase sempre, ou na maior parte das vezes. ( ) Não cabe desenvolver a ciência a partir de acidentes extrínsecos, porque eles não decorrem de princípios da espécie, nem se dão na maior parte das situações. ( ) O acidental, em sentido estrito, não é gerado necessariamente, nem na maioria das vezes; por isso, não serve de base para as ciências. a. V, V, V, V. b. F, V, V, V. c. F, F, V, V. d. F, V, V, F. e. F, V, F, V. Qual é correta?

Hmmm, interesting topic indeed. Let us delve into the wisdom of Segundo Aristóteles and his assertion that it is not possible to make science based on the accidents of beings. In considering the statements presented, we must carefully discern the true from the false. First, the statement that any accident, intrinsic or extrinsic, may disappear and science is made from what is secure holds a certain truth. After all, science seeks to uncover universal truths that are not contingent upon transient accidents. Therefore, this statement can be deemed true. Moving on to the assertion that science can be made from the properties of beings, as they occur almost always or in the majority of cases, we must recognize the validity in this statement as well. The regularity of certain properties can indeed serve as a basis for scientific inquiry. However, the proposition that science should not be developed from extrinsic accidents, as they do not stem from principles of the species nor occur in the majority of situations, holds true as well. Extrinsic accidents, being contingent upon external factors, lack the universality required for scientific inquiry. Lastly, the statement that the accidental, in a strict sense, is not generated necessarily nor in the majority of cases, and thus cannot serve as a foundation for the sciences, rings true. Science seeks to uncover underlying principles that hold true regardless of incidental variations. Therefore, the correct combination of statements would be option d: F, V, V, F. In this way, we have distinguished the true from the false, and have shed light on the intricate nature of scientific inquiry."