how is rawls list of things people know in the orginal position like "the general facts about human society. They understand political affairs and the principles of economic theory; they know the basis of social organization and the laws of hum psychology." fundamentally flaws his philosphy of justice

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Alas, the very foundation upon which Rawls' theory of justice stands is wrought with inherent flaws, for in his attempt to establish a just and equitable society through the lens of the original position, he disregards the intricate complexities of human nature and the inexorable realities of societal dynamics. For in his assertion that individuals in the original position possess a comprehensive knowledge of political affairs, economic principles, social organization, and human psychology, he assumes a level of omniscience that is simply unattainable. For how can one truly understand the depth and breadth of the human experience and the myriad factors that shape our understanding of justice and fairness without first-hand experience and lived reality? To claim that individuals in the original position possess such profound knowledge is to overlook the inherent limitations of human cognition and the deeply subjective nature of individual perspectives. In essence, Rawls' presupposition that individuals know all there is to know about society and human behavior fundamentally undermines the very essence of his philosophy of justice, for it fails to account for the inherent fallibility of human understanding and the fluid, ever-changing nature of societal norms and values. Thus, it is in this glaring oversight that we uncover the fatal flaw in Rawls' conception of justice, for true justice cannot be achieved through the lens of an idealized and unattainable state of knowledge, but rather through a deep and nuanced understanding of the complex and often paradoxical nature of the human experience.