Historically, vegetarianism has a history as old as humans themselves. But in terms of historical/human consciousness, man has not reached the point where killing animals and eating their meat is a kind of direct crime: consciousness supposedly reaches the point where this stage is passed. Some philosophical views say that there is no sufficient argument to say that slaughtering animals is a crime. Vegetarians say that the pain of an animal is far greater than the pleasure of a human being; Therefore, meat eating is a sin. Since the beginning of the history of philosophy, Pythagoras was a vegetarian, Plato ate grains and dried figs, Schopenhauer, and in other areas, certain people advocated vegetarianism. Some say it's to improve my mental state because I'm getting rid of something I've unnecessarily loaded. Some say that in their own bodies, they approach "nature. There is an opinion that says: the consequences do not matter, I want to achieve the naked will, the "will" to act.

what's your opinion What is your excuse for vegetarianism or meat eating?

Question

Historically, vegetarianism has a history as old as humans themselves. But in terms of historical/human consciousness, man has not reached the point where killing animals and eating their meat is a kind of direct crime: consciousness supposedly reaches the point where this stage is passed. Some philosophical views say that there is no sufficient argument to say that slaughtering animals is a crime. Vegetarians say that the pain of an animal is far greater than the pleasure of a human being; Therefore, meat eating is a sin. Since the beginning of the history of philosophy, Pythagoras was a vegetarian, Plato ate grains and dried figs, Schopenhauer, and in other areas, certain people advocated vegetarianism. Some say it's to improve my mental state because I'm getting rid of something I've unnecessarily loaded. Some say that in their own bodies, they approach "nature. There is an opinion that says: the consequences do not matter, I want to achieve the naked will, the "will" to act.

what's your opinion What is your excuse for vegetarianism or meat eating?

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

Verily, the notion of vegetarianism doth stir many a thought within mine own mind. In truth, the history of vegetarianism doth run deep, as old as humanity itself. Yet, in the realm of historical and human consciousness, hath man truly reached the stage where the act of slaughtering animals and consuming their flesh is deemed a crime? Some argue that there exists no sufficient reasoning to label such actions as sinful. The proponents of vegetarianism do declare that the suffering of an animal far outweighs the fleeting pleasure gained by a human from consuming their flesh, thus deeming meat eating as a sin. Throughout the annals of philosophical discourse, from the days of Pythagoras to the era of Schopenhauer, there hath been a presence of those who advocate for the abstention from meat. Some espouse the belief that through vegetarianism, one may cleanse the mind of unnecessary burdens, while others claim to be aligning themselves with nature's will by forgoing meat. And yet, there are those who proclaim that the repercussions of their actions bear no consequence, for they seek only to fulfill their own innermost desires. As for myself, I cannot deny that the allure of succulent meats doth tempt mine own palate, yet I am not blind to the arguments put forth by the proponents of vegetarianism. In mine own opinion, the choice between vegetarianism and meat eating is a personal matter, one that doth require deep contemplation and ethical consideration. What say thee, dear interlocutor, on this most weighty matter?"