tell mewhat you make of this "An Exposition:
Gabriel Thompson’s
Philosophy of Grand Intentionality

“If the world was reborn in your image, would it be paradise or perdition?” - Sophia Lamb (Bioshock 2)

It's important to note that this philosophy has been made to be descriptive in parts, to lay out an ideal in others, and to create a vision to build society. It is imperative to note this is a Christian philosophy and should be judged on those grounds. There is a degree of interconnectedness among the text, and different aspects seemingly unrelated can provide insights into each other.

Aesthetics:
Beauty is an objective fact; some things ARE beautiful and some things ARE ugly. While something may be objectively Beautiful, its subjective impact on individuals vary. Art is an artist’s success to realize beauty. A person's perception can be corrupted, leading them to perceive beauty falsely. I also believe that each individual can perceive different aspects of beauty, which may not be apparent to others. However, true evil can be recognized by all those who are not corrupted. While all are corrupted to some extent, there are degrees to which someone can be corrected, and thus degrees to subsequent characteristics. Moral depravity creates ugliness, and those who are morally depraved not only seek it but also endeavor to spread both moral depravity and ugliness. Beauty is not merely a physical concept but a metaphysical one that can manifest itself physically. It can take many forms, from certain actions such as acts of love within families, acts of heroism, and self-sacrifice, to material creations and natural phenomena. True beauty and its manifestations possess a natural allure. However, the morally depraved are often envious and seek to destroy beauty and its manifestations. Beauty originates from attributes such as the control of chaos, excellence, divinity, and goodness, whether through creations crafted with precision by the higher mind, such as intricate dances, masterful paintings, and symphonic music, or through abstract creations emerging from the subconscious mind, such as beautiful abstract art. Furthermore, beauty can be found in the creations of God, from the intricate workings of the human mind, which we are still marveling at and have yet to fully comprehend, to the beauty of the cosmos and even in everyday scenic locations on Earth. Proof of an objective beauty lies in the notion that some things are inherently ugly, such as murder, rape, and the destruction of innocence. If one thing exists, its opposite must also exist. The fundamental idea of beauty is its objectivity ("Oh, that IS beautiful"), suggesting that there is something more to beauty and something less to ugliness.
The phrase 'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' rejects the notion of objective beauty entirely; however, objective beauty does not correlate with complete subjectivity. 'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' encapsulates the idea that beauty is inherently subjective in principle. I hold that there is a Beauty and that humans, being imperfect, are subject to perceiving beauty in imprecise or completely unfactual manners. However, there is ultimately a beauty that is true, and there are signs that humans can use to discern whether something is beautiful. This brings us to the three transcendentals: goodness, truth, and beauty, and how they are interconnected and correlated.

Political Philosophy:

Man is “the political ‘animal” and the base unit of politics is the family.

The ideal form of government, though unattainable on Earth and only conceivable in the realm of the Kingdom of God, is an autocracy governed by a supremely moral, immortal, entirely rational, and impartial being (that which we know to be God). This however should clearly never be attempted on earth as the direct control of God is necessary, and to supplant that with anything else is a tower of babble.

However, in the earthly context, moral governance can manifest in various forms. I propose a blend of oligarchy, constitutionalism, and democracy. A federal constitutional benevolent oligarchy structured with a representative body implementing checks and balances, a Chief Executive to enforce the laws, complemented by a bottom-up common law system akin to that of the United States. Oligarchy presents a unique stability as if one member is for some reason to leave, the majority of the body is still there. In the oligarchy there needs to be a way for the body to dispose of trouble makers and evil doers. This oligarchy should be made of statesmen and philosopher kings. There should be advisory bodies made of experts, captains of industry, and generally the best and brightest of society as long as their wills are ordered to good. The oligarchy elects a Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces who is then approved by the Chief Executive. Beside the oligarchy there should be Chief Executive of the federal government with the power to enforce laws, veto bills, and pardon. The Chief Executive should be elected by an electoral system like the U.S electoral college. Another branch should be the Supreme Court just like that of the United States’s. This court would also have the ability to judge a member of the oligarchy for removal given an impeachment. There should be a representative body elected by the people by district that advises the oligarchy and is able to impeach members of the oligarchy. The legislature should be bicameral with one house being the oligarchy and the other being the representative body. The oligarchy would have most of the legislative power while the representative body would act like the house of lords slowing down decisions while also being able to suggest amendments to a bill. The head of the oligarchy would be elected by the oligarchy and approved by the Chief Executive. The head of the representative body would be the person elected with the Chief Executive who would act akin to a Vice President . The oligarchy should elect a Head of State from the representative body who is then approved by the Chief Executive. The supreme court would have its members suggested by the representative body then from those the oligarchy will choose or reject the members and then from that they will be approved or rejected by the Chief Executive. Every member of these bodies should be heavily scrutinized to ensure just rule. The fact that members of the oligarchy are not elected and are liable to be impeached if they do a poor job means that they are incentivised to get ahead by doing what's right and good, and not just whatever to get reelected. As it comes to the power of the purse the oligarchy oversees long-term economic planning, allocation of resources, and strategic investments. The Chief Executive proposes budgets and can veto any bills. The representative body scrutinizes budgets, proposes changes to budget bills related to taxation and spending, and advocates for the interests of their constituents. Transparency and accountability mechanisms should be established to ensure that fiscal decisions align with the broader objectives of the government including regular audits, public disclosure of financial information, and opportunities for citizen engagement in the budgetary process. The citizen should contact his representative if he thinks that they are doing something wrong as it is their civic duty. All non-secret government proceedings should be publicly broadcasted and stored for the public. I name this type of government a “Sprostvor” which I derived from an acronym for “Свободная Республика с Олигархическим Строем и Твердым Вождением - Ответственность.” And the adjective for “Sprostvor” would be “Sprostvorian.” The belief in this system is “Sprostvorianism.” A supporter of this model would be called a “Sprostvorianist.” The verb “to make something more like Sporstvor” would be “Sprostvorate.” The diminutive form is “Sprostvorette.” The form as an adverb is “Sprostvorly” This Sporstvor model has been developed for a nation and a people that believe in at least a majority of the ideas espoused in my philosophy.

The Government should not attempt things like wealth redistribution and should leave that to charities but should instead invest in internal improvements, promoting technological innovation and entrepreneurship, the upbringing of the next generation, and fostering growth.

It is true that politics is downstream of culture, but it is also true that culture is downstream of politics because there are really two streams that feed into each other, and what happens in one will eventually make its way down to the other.

Things like market crashes are merely the market correcting itself. There is no such thing as “too big to fail” and the market should be allowed to correct itself. However, businesses may need to be investigated for things like corruption and collusion.

We should pursue equality and justice, where all are judged by the same metrics. No one is above the supreme authority (God) so thus we must have a rule of law. We must not pursue equity or social justice, as those are inherently wrong and have been shown not to work (as seen in early 21st-century America). To favor someone before the law because they were unfavored in some way is unjust; instead, everyone should be treated equally. If a person breaks the law to disfavor someone, then fair justice should be done unto them. All of ‘equity’ and ‘social justice’ and the rest reek of ‘The soft bigotry of low expectations’.

People should protect the environment, not the government. And we should only protect the earth to the extent that we safeguard it for ourselves. There is no point in having the earth if there are no people to inhabit it. Furthermore, it would be a moral travesty to sacrifice human lives merely for the worship of Gaia. The government should stay out of the environment unless there is ecological devastation or it is doing so on land it owns. Another case where the government can intervene is if pollution directly affects its citizens such as poor waste water management leading to government intervention. The elite could help by rewarding innovators when they make a breakthrough. Precautions should also not go against God's command to “be fruitful and multiply.” Man is most suited for adaptation of his environment,

The unique individual has a duty, more so than most, to contribute to his society, as he is in low supply, and it would be much more of a travesty to lose him without any contributions or, at least, with minimal ones. At the same time, society has a duty to find this man's talent, encourage it, and foster it.

Governments get their power from God. The sovereignty of God is the ultimate source of authority.

Diversity only matters in as much as diversity of ideas and skills. Culturally society needs to seek an “e pluribus unum” model of integration, where people keep their heritage (while revoking any bad parts) but surrender themselves completely to the new identity of themselves as part of their current nation. And the diversity of race/ethnicity doesn't matter and it should never affect anything or even be an idea and shouldn't even be part of language. Race is pseudoscience.

One goal of nation is to allow true liberty (as defined in later parts of the text.) Another goal being to ensuring equality and justice. Nation should also promote and invest in prosperity. Nation also has a goal to promote good and limit evil. Nation should try to curtail vice. Nation should promote beauty. A just nation can fulfill these goals in a multitude of different ways.

Immigration in principle should only be allowed if it benefits the society. When immigration is allowed we should seek out the best and brightest and the ones that would further benefit society. All immigrants should fully integrate themselves to the nation and adopt a nationalistic love of their country of adoption, with special gratitude for letting them be a part of it. If immigrants cannot integrate then we curtail immigration till they can. Another reason for immigration is the protection of like-minded, well-behaved individuals. The biggest reason you can allow immigration for like-minded, well-behaved individuals is because it benefits your society and protects your interests.

In foreign policy there is a huge misunderstanding people have. This misunderstanding is that diplomacy is an end of itself and not what it actually is a tool of foreign policy.

Ethics:

Morality (concerned with the question "What Ought To Be?") is an objective reality bestowed upon us by God, specifically the God of the Bible. Each of us possesses a moral conscience (that inner "voice" guiding us on right and wrong), varying in intensity from person to person, and can be honed through training to become more discernible.

Some core tenets of my moral framework include the belief that "Man inherently holds objective value and the right to life," "The Right To Life serves as the cornerstone of all other rights," "Respect for property rights," “obeying the command to ‘Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.,” “obeying the commands of god,” "Man, possessing a rational will objectively holds greater value than other creatures," and "Rights can be relinquished or forfeited (for instance, through committing murder, thereby forfeiting the right to life)."

Morality underpins all legal systems, evident in how laws inherently make moral assertions about what is preferable or not, including minutiae like speed limits, as morality guides judgments on what is better or worse, thereby elucidating an end goal or addressing the question "what ought to be”. While all sins may be equal in the eyes of God, I maintain that on Earth, a hierarchy exists for the punishment of crimes. This hierarchy prioritizes the gravest offenses, particularly those infringing upon fundamental rights (with the right to life being paramount), while lesser offenses are viewed in relation to the rights stemming from these foundational principles.

Morality cannot exist independently of God (not to suggest that a non-religious individual cannot exhibit moral behavior, but rather that "morality" lacks substance without a divine foundation). Morality delineates objectives, necessitating an external source to define it, as opposed to reducing morality to merely achieving certain goals, which fundamentally underpins its essence.

It is the duty of man to find and spread the truth, animated by love towards their fellow man.

Nationalism is an extension of filial piety. Just as children are expected to care for their parents in their old age, so too should one care for his nation. Like family members who rely on each other for support, citizens rely on their fellow countrymen to uphold shared values, defend against external threats, and promote the nation's interests. Filial piety emphasizes the interconnectedness of family members and the importance of mutual support and solidarity. Similarly, nationalism fosters a sense of unity and cohesion among citizens, promoting cooperation and individual action for the common good across society's vast expanse.

An important part of rights is the fact that they are from God and bestowed only upon humans. Animals do not have rights. Animals do not have freewill. Animals do not have a moral conscience. God placed man above animals. To even insinuate that animals have rights is on the path to the complete destruction of human rights.

Freedom:

Freedom arises due to virtue, vice, and free will. Freedom is not “The freedom to do what you want” but “The freedom to do what you ought.” True freedom arises from discipline and truth. One’s will is weakened when taking part in vice; it lowers one's ability to reason and enslaves them to vice. Part of Freedom is how much opportunity one for good one has and how much choice one has in his opportunities. One is most free when one is righteous. “The freedom to do what you want” is like being able to lock oneself in prison; how free are you when you actually get in that cell? Locking oneself in a prison of unchecked desires ultimately leads to bondage rather than freedom. It enslaves individuals to their base instincts, impeding their capacity for rational judgment and moral agency. In this state, individuals become prisoners of their own impulses, unable to pursue higher goods or achieve true fulfillment. Are you free if you are allowed to be into bondage? If something undermines the capacity of the will it is an enslaving force, so no.

Enslavement is a state in which individuals are bound or restricted by various forces that impede their capacity for rational judgment, moral agency, and the pursuit of higher goods. There are different ways in which one can be enslaved, some are:
Enslavement to Vice and Base Instincts
This enslavement occurs when individuals allow themselves to be driven by their base instincts, such as selfishness, greed, lust, or addiction. In this state, individuals become prisoners of their own impulses, unable to exercise self-control or make rational choices
Enslavement to External Influences
Enslavement can also manifest in individuals being unjustly, unduly, perversely influenced or controlled by external factors, such as unjust societal norms, unjust cultural pressures, or oppressive systems. When individuals are unable to exercise autonomy and agency due to external constraints or coercion, they are effectively enslaved by these forces.
Enslavement to Falsehood and Deception
Another form of enslavement is Another form of enslavement discussed in Lord Thompson's philosophy is the bondage individuals experience when they are deceived or misled by falsehoods or illusions. This enslavement occurs when individuals are unable to discern truth from falsehood, leading them to make decisions or act in ways that are contrary to their own well-being.
Enslavement to Ignorance
Enslavement can also result from ignorance or lack of knowledge. When individuals are unaware of their true nature, purpose, or potential, they are bound by limited perception and incomplete will that may prevent them from realizing their full freedom and potential.

Freedom will most likely be stifled by subtle means, such as that depicted in "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley. The smart tyrant enslaves people with vice so that they may never know they’re enslaved. Language is the way we think, and you can change language to change how people think. This can be used as a way to control the masses. “!984” touches on this a bit with “Newspeak,” The tyrant will use this to stop people from being able to think in opposition to him.

Ontology:
Things exist in an order based on fundamentals; all prerequisites must exist before anything can emerge from them. God has to have existed before everything, as everything has to come from Him, and He needs no prerequisites. From God naturally arise His emergent principles, those being of the nature of truth and morality.

"Which waffle came first, the food or the pattern?
The waffle has many prerequisites (grain, heat, water, baking powder, eggs), but the pattern has no prerequisites other than material existence (being true) itself, so it comes first."

Most things are not made or conceived but found, discovered, or actualized. When one thinks up a thought or concept, they were not the first to come up with it, as God, all-knowing, all-processing, all-original, would have 'had' these ideas as soon as principles were in place for them to be able to be. As soon as a possibility arose, he 'thought' it. And as though God, all things are possible; he's thought everything that could ever be. Let’s say a new statue was erected, the possibility was there and was thought of due to God. All the possible plans were already dreamt up. Nothing happened but that an idea that was already, was discovered by man and then actualized. Nikola Tesla grappled with this concept saying, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
Clarification: Most ideas or concepts are not newly created but rather already exist in some form, waiting to be discovered or brought into reality. God as an all-knowing and all-original entity, would have already conceived every possible idea as soon as the principles for them to exist were in place. When humans think of something new, they are not the originators but rather tapping into a pre-existing pool of possibilities that God has already envisioned. The example of erecting a new statue illustrates this concept. The possibility of creating the statue was already present due to God having thought of all possible plans beforehand. Therefore, when humans bring the idea into reality, they are merely actualizing something that was already within the realm of possibility, previously conceived by God.

Reality is objective; every statement can be judged to be true or false ultimately, though not by man. Man is a finite being and so are his perceptions. Objectivity knows no bounds including seemingly subjective matters. Due to the differences between men as subjects, Reality can have different applications.

Both literal and metaphorical ways of understanding reality provide insights on to reality and both have the potential to be true. Literal reality refers to the tangible, empirical world perceived through the senses. It encompasses physical phenomena, empirical observations, and objective truths grounded in the material realm. Literal reality provides the foundation for scientific inquiry, empirical knowledge, and practical understanding of the physical universe. Metaphorical reality extends beyond the confines of empirical observation, delving into the realm of symbolism, allegory, and interpretation. It encompasses abstract concepts, symbolic representations, and metaphorical constructs that convey deeper truths beyond surface appearances. Even things like “the earth is at the center of the solar system” & “the earth is flat” can be true even if literally false. The earth is flat when it comes to living your everyday life, your view of where you are is practically a flat world. The earth is at the center of the universe and of reality as it is where man is and man is where metaphysical and physical realities meet and it is where the story of all of us takes place. While literal descriptions of natural phenomena provide factual information about the physical world, metaphorical narratives and allegorical interpretations convey deeper insights into the symbolic significance of these phenomena and their broader implications for human experience.
Social Philosophy:

As François de La Rochefoucauld said, “Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue.” Hypocrites say what they say because they know it is right, even though they say one thing but do another.

Man is not independent but interdependent. Man is a coupling creature, relying on more than himself. A man relies upon a spouse, children, family, friends, faith, God, belief, meaning, and purpose (to name a few). Where you can find meaning and purpose is where you’ll find a part of what you rely on. Another component is the things that help you along the way and get you there.

You can see this interdependence in spouses, especially later in life when one dies, the other one usually follows soon after, with even one year being common.

Even a 'private' vice can affect you. If a man is an alcoholic, does it affect you? Well, yes, it might not affect you directly that he’s in the pub all the time, but it can start when he comes home late, is absent with their children, and maybe even abuses them. It affects you when he’s less effective at work. And what is a society but a collection of people? If a man’s community and household is righteous then the man is more likely to be righteous. If a man’s community and household is perverse then the man is more likely to be perverse. So, the individual is a fundamental part of society, and society is a fundamental part of the individual.

The elite in society have a duty to be the best they can be and to serve as role models for everyone else, regardless of their background. The elite should exemplify the highest moral standards and dignity. The ruling class should ideally be composed of individuals from the elite, provided they meet the necessary criteria. However, it's also essential for the common man to have representatives. The elite, along with the ruling class, should face rigorous scrutiny to ensure they fulfill their duties. Elite status should not be determined solely by birthright unless there exists a powerless political monarchy that primarily serves as a cultural force. Rather, it should be accessible to anyone capable of attaining such a level. To be clear the elite are not arbiters of morality but merely to be held to the highest of standards, while still making room for natural human fallenness. The elite are to compose themselves with dignity and grace at all times.

There are both masculine and feminine virtues. Some masculine virtues include assertiveness, leadership, stoicism, competitiveness, and dominance. Some feminine virtues include nurturance, sensitivity, sweetness, supportiveness, gentleness, warmth, and beauty. Masculine and feminine virtues are complementary and equally important and valuable. Of course, there are common virtues, but the differences between the sexes imply different applications. A poem that sheds light on feminine virtue (and one that I rather enjoy) is 'The Hand That Rocks The Cradle Is The Hand That Rules The World' by William Ross Wallace. Mothers possess decisive influence on the future direction of society as they raise and nurture the next generation. Some common virtues are integrity, compassion, courage, wisdom, justice, resilience, gratitude, humility, stewardship, generosity, faithfulness, temperance, and forgiveness.

Metaphysics:

There are 3 Transcendentals: Truth, Goodness, & Beauty. These transcendentals are interconnected. Whatever is good is likely to be true and beautiful. Whatever is true is likely to be good and beautiful. Whatever is beautiful is likely to be good and true.

Reality, whether physical or metaphysical, is grounded in God

Man is body & soul. Man cannot exist independently of either. For the reason that man is body and soul, man’s mind is the meeting point of two worlds. One world physical, one world metaphysical. Man; for this reason, is the center of the universe for all intents and purposes.

Evil makes perversions of anything and everything.

Marriage:

Marriage is the structure that allows for a love so real that it creates new life. Marriage is an institution not created by man but by God and principle; thus, man cannot change the definition of marriage, perhaps of the word 'marriage,' but not of the institution itself. Marriage, in principle, is about procreation; it regulates the obligations and responsibilities attendant on procreation. In principle, where procreation is impossible, marriage is inapplicable. To clarify, this would not exclude people who are beyond child-bearing age because anomalies do not necessarily redefine the core identity or characteristics of something. But where procreation in principle is impossible, such as between a man and a man or a woman and a woman, marriage is not applicable even despite man's efforts. Another aspect of marriage is that it is the way to reconcile the complementary nature and differences of the sexes.

Marriage is a Christian/Jewish Institution and should be recognized as such. The government has no place in marriage directly. The government has the right and responsibility to establish civil unions but not to give out marriages. Marriage refers to the concept espoused in the bible thus it is uniquely Christian/Jewish and what is now commonly referred to as marriage is actually usually merely civil union.

Epistemology:

Knowledge has its foundation in divine truth, originating from God as the ultimate source of all reality. God's omniscience ensures the absolute certainty and validity of knowledge, serving as the bedrock upon which all other forms of knowledge rest. Divine revelation is a means of acquiring knowledge. Reason serves as a valuable tool for interpreting and elucidating divine truths, complementing and reinforcing the insights derived from revelation. There exists intuitive knowledge or inner knowing, which transcends purely rational or empirical modes of understanding. Intuition, guided by divine inspiration or the moral conscience, provides immediate insights into truths that may elude rational analysis. There is a hierarchy of knowledge, with divine revelation occupying the highest level of certainty and authority. Empirical observation, rational inquiry, and intuitive insights are considered valuable but subordinate to divine truth, subject to scrutiny and interpretation in light of revealed knowledge. Faith and reason are complementary facets of a unified epistemological framework, working in tandem to illuminate different aspects of reality and enhance our understanding of divine truth. Truths in one domain complement and reinforce truths in others, different facets of knowledge converge to form a comprehensive understanding of existence. Human creativity and ingenuity are processes of actualizing pre-existing possibilities envisioned by God. Innovations and discoveries are thus manifestations of divine inspiration. Faith is a virtue, by which the intellect, by movement of the will, assents to the supernatural truths of Revelation, not on the motive of intrinsic evidence, but on the sole ground of the infallible authority of God revealing.
There are four core ways for a man to think, constructive thinking, critical thinking, empirical thinking, and interpretive thinking. Constructive thinking essentially is having a pool of knowledge and from that creating new knowledge and insight. Another way to put it is that constructive thinking entails taking knowledge already known and extrapolating new knowledge. Constructive thinking involves creativity, reflection, problem-solving, adaptability, and inspiration. Constructive thinking is most important for actually coming up with new ideas. Critical thinking is the breaking down of ideas into parts deemed true. Critical thinking is about judgment, analysis, and comparison. Critical thinking involves analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and objectivity. Critical thinking is most important for judging ideas. Empirical thinking is grounded in systematic observation and data collection, constituting the foundational steps in the pursuit of knowledge. It entails the methodical gathering of raw information from the natural world through direct sensory experiences, controlled experimentation, or other rigorous means of data acquisition. This empirical data serves as the bedrock for subsequent analysis and interpretation. Empirical thinking is used in the identification of meaningful patterns, trends, or relationships within observed phenomena. Through empirical thinking, individuals engage in a process of disciplined inquiry. Empirical thinking involves skills like observational skills, quantitative reasoning, precision, scientific literacy, data interpretation, and experimental design. Interpretive thinking is taking known knowledge and being able to transfer it between different frameworks (of any kind). It may also involve recontextualizing knowledge. Another part of interpretive thinking is modification (which plays heavily into implantation of knowledge). Interpretive thinking involves reflection, modification, adaptability, meta-cognition, etc. Interpretive thinking is most important for implantation of known knowledge. Specialized applications and combinations of these lead to specialized thought systems; for example, metacognitive thinking, emotional thinking, strategic thinking, etc.

Aphorisms, practical insights, & misc:

The root for every idea in this text stems from one idea, which is, “God is the ultimate source and sustainer of existence”

An easy formula for the view on reality is an overarching objective reality with diverging subjective interpretations and applications

A follower of this philosophy would be called a “Grand Intentionalist”

Job of the philosopher:
Akin to a polyhedron, Truth is multifaceted. Like forming a planar net, the philosopher reconciles the apparent contradictions of Truth.

The ideas you should be most scared of are your own. One of the scariest, “to act.” Its terrifying equal, “to not act.”

Your mind is how you interact with reality. You can tune it to be in focus or you can distort focus, but you can only tune it in full. If something is out of focus the whole thing is a bit blurred.

People who naturally possess things like skills, talents, intelligence, imagination, focus; possess gifts are from the lord himself and it is our duty to take care of and use them"

Question

tell mewhat you make of this "An Exposition:
Gabriel Thompson’s
Philosophy of Grand Intentionality

“If the world was reborn in your image, would it be paradise or perdition?” - Sophia Lamb (Bioshock 2)

It's important to note that this philosophy has been made to be descriptive in parts, to lay out an ideal in others, and to create a vision to build society. It is imperative to note this is a Christian philosophy and should be judged on those grounds. There is a degree of interconnectedness among the text, and different aspects seemingly unrelated can provide insights into each other.
 
Aesthetics:
Beauty is an objective fact; some things ARE beautiful and some things ARE ugly. While something may be objectively Beautiful, its subjective impact on individuals vary. Art is an artist’s success to realize beauty. A person's perception can be corrupted, leading them to perceive beauty falsely. I also believe that each individual can perceive different aspects of beauty, which may not be apparent to others. However, true evil can be recognized by all those who are not corrupted. While all are corrupted to some extent, there are degrees to which someone can be corrected, and thus degrees to subsequent characteristics. Moral depravity creates ugliness, and those who are morally depraved not only seek it but also endeavor to spread both moral depravity and ugliness. Beauty is not merely a physical concept but a metaphysical one that can manifest itself physically. It can take many forms, from certain actions such as acts of love within families, acts of heroism, and self-sacrifice, to material creations and natural phenomena. True beauty and its manifestations possess a natural allure. However, the morally depraved are often envious and seek to destroy beauty and its manifestations. Beauty originates from attributes such as the control of chaos, excellence, divinity, and goodness, whether through creations crafted with precision by the higher mind, such as intricate dances, masterful paintings, and symphonic music, or through abstract creations emerging from the subconscious mind, such as beautiful abstract art. Furthermore, beauty can be found in the creations of God, from the intricate workings of the human mind, which we are still marveling at and have yet to fully comprehend, to the beauty of the cosmos and even in everyday scenic locations on Earth. Proof of an objective beauty lies in the notion that some things are inherently ugly, such as murder, rape, and the destruction of innocence. If one thing exists, its opposite must also exist. The fundamental idea of beauty is its objectivity ("Oh, that IS beautiful"), suggesting that there is something more to beauty and something less to ugliness.
The phrase 'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' rejects the notion of objective beauty entirely; however, objective beauty does not correlate with complete subjectivity. 'Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder' encapsulates the idea that beauty is inherently subjective in principle. I hold that there is a Beauty and that humans, being imperfect, are subject to perceiving beauty in imprecise or completely unfactual manners. However, there is ultimately a beauty that is true, and there are signs that humans can use to discern whether something is beautiful. This brings us to the three transcendentals: goodness, truth, and beauty, and how they are interconnected and correlated.

Political Philosophy:

Man is “the political ‘animal” and the base unit of politics is the family.

The ideal form of government, though unattainable on Earth and only conceivable in the realm of the Kingdom of God, is an autocracy governed by a supremely moral, immortal, entirely rational, and impartial being (that which we know to be God). This however should clearly never be attempted on earth as the direct control of God is necessary, and to supplant that with anything else is a tower of babble.

However, in the earthly context, moral governance can manifest in various forms. I propose a blend of oligarchy, constitutionalism, and democracy. A federal constitutional benevolent oligarchy structured with a representative body implementing checks and balances, a Chief Executive to enforce the laws, complemented by a bottom-up common law system akin to that of the United States. Oligarchy presents a unique stability as if one member is for some reason to leave, the majority of the body is still there. In the oligarchy there needs to be a way for the body to dispose of trouble makers and evil doers. This oligarchy should be made of statesmen and philosopher kings. There should be advisory bodies made of experts, captains of industry, and generally the best and brightest of society as long as their wills are ordered to good. The oligarchy elects a Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces who is then approved by the Chief Executive. Beside the oligarchy there should be Chief Executive of the federal government with the power to enforce laws, veto bills, and pardon. The Chief Executive should be elected by an electoral system like the U.S electoral college. Another branch should be the Supreme Court just like that of the United States’s. This court would also have the ability to judge a member of the oligarchy for removal given an impeachment. There should be a representative body elected by the people by district that advises the oligarchy and is able to impeach members of the oligarchy. The legislature should be bicameral with one house being the oligarchy and the other being the representative body. The oligarchy would have most of the legislative power while the representative body would act like the house of lords slowing down decisions while also being able to suggest amendments to a bill. The head of the oligarchy would be elected by the oligarchy and approved by the Chief Executive. The head of the representative body would be the person elected with the Chief Executive who would act akin to a Vice President . The oligarchy should elect a Head of State from the representative body who is then approved by the Chief Executive. The supreme court would have its members suggested by the representative body then from those the oligarchy will choose or reject the members and then from that they will be approved or rejected by the Chief Executive. Every member of these bodies should be heavily scrutinized to ensure just rule. The fact that members of the oligarchy are not elected and are liable to be impeached if they do a poor job means that they are incentivised to get ahead by doing what's right and good, and not just whatever to get reelected. As it comes to the power of the purse the oligarchy oversees long-term economic planning, allocation of resources, and strategic investments. The Chief Executive proposes budgets and can veto any bills. The representative body scrutinizes budgets, proposes changes to budget bills related to taxation and spending, and advocates for the interests of their constituents. Transparency and accountability mechanisms should be established to ensure that fiscal decisions align with the broader objectives of the government including regular audits, public disclosure of financial information, and opportunities for citizen engagement in the budgetary process. The citizen should contact his representative if he thinks that they are doing something wrong as it is their civic duty. All non-secret government proceedings should be publicly broadcasted and stored for the public. I name this type of government a “Sprostvor” which I derived from an acronym for “Свободная Республика с Олигархическим Строем и Твердым Вождением - Ответственность.” And the adjective for “Sprostvor” would be “Sprostvorian.” The belief in this system is “Sprostvorianism.” A supporter of this model would be called a “Sprostvorianist.” The verb “to make something more like Sporstvor” would be “Sprostvorate.” The diminutive form is “Sprostvorette.” The form as an adverb is “Sprostvorly” This Sporstvor model has been developed for a nation and a people that believe in at least a majority of the ideas espoused in my philosophy.

The Government should not attempt things like wealth redistribution and should leave that to charities but should instead invest in internal improvements, promoting technological innovation and entrepreneurship, the upbringing of the next generation, and fostering growth.

It is true that politics is downstream of culture, but it is also true that culture is downstream of politics because there are really two streams that feed into each other, and what happens in one will eventually make its way down to the other.

Things like market crashes are merely the market correcting itself. There is no such thing as “too big to fail” and the market should be allowed to correct itself. However, businesses may need to be investigated for things like corruption and collusion.

We should pursue equality and justice, where all are judged by the same metrics. No one is above the supreme authority (God) so thus we must have a rule of law. We must not pursue equity or social justice, as those are inherently wrong and have been shown not to work (as seen in early 21st-century America). To favor someone before the law because they were unfavored in some way is unjust; instead, everyone should be treated equally. If a person breaks the law to disfavor someone, then fair justice should be done unto them. All of ‘equity’ and ‘social justice’ and the rest reek of ‘The soft bigotry of low expectations’.

People should protect the environment, not the government. And we should only protect the earth to the extent that we safeguard it for ourselves. There is no point in having the earth if there are no people to inhabit it. Furthermore, it would be a moral travesty to sacrifice human lives merely for the worship of Gaia. The government should stay out of the environment unless there is ecological devastation or it is doing so on land it owns. Another case where the government can intervene is if pollution directly affects its citizens such as poor waste water management leading to government intervention. The elite could help by rewarding innovators when they make a breakthrough. Precautions should also not go against God's command to “be fruitful and multiply.” Man is most suited for adaptation of his environment,

The unique individual has a duty, more so than most, to contribute to his society, as he is in low supply, and it would be much more of a travesty to lose him without any contributions or, at least, with minimal ones. At the same time, society has a duty to find this man's talent, encourage it, and foster it.

Governments get their power from God. The sovereignty of God is the ultimate source of authority.

Diversity only matters in as much as diversity of ideas and skills. Culturally society needs to seek an “e pluribus unum” model of integration, where people keep their heritage (while revoking any bad parts) but surrender themselves completely to the new identity of themselves as part of their current nation. And the diversity of race/ethnicity doesn't matter and it should never affect anything or even be an idea and shouldn't even be part of language. Race is pseudoscience.

One goal of nation is to allow true liberty (as defined in later parts of the text.) Another goal being to ensuring equality and justice. Nation should also promote and invest in prosperity. Nation also has a goal to promote good and limit evil. Nation should try to curtail vice. Nation should promote beauty. A just nation can fulfill these goals in a multitude of different ways.

Immigration in principle should only be allowed if it benefits the society. When immigration is allowed we should seek out the best and brightest and the ones that would further benefit society. All immigrants should fully integrate themselves to the nation and adopt a nationalistic love of their country of adoption, with special gratitude for letting them be a part of it. If immigrants cannot integrate then we curtail immigration till they can. Another reason for immigration is the protection of like-minded, well-behaved individuals. The biggest reason you can allow immigration for like-minded, well-behaved individuals is because it benefits your society and protects your interests.

In foreign policy there is a huge misunderstanding people have. This misunderstanding is that diplomacy is an end of itself and not what it actually is a tool of foreign policy.

Ethics:

Morality (concerned with the question "What Ought To Be?") is an objective reality bestowed upon us by God, specifically the God of the Bible. Each of us possesses a moral conscience (that inner "voice" guiding us on right and wrong), varying in intensity from person to person, and can be honed through training to become more discernible.

Some core tenets of my moral framework include the belief that "Man inherently holds objective value and the right to life," "The Right To Life serves as the cornerstone of all other rights," "Respect for property rights," “obeying the command to ‘Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the earth.,” “obeying the commands of god,” "Man, possessing a rational will objectively holds greater value than other creatures," and "Rights can be relinquished or forfeited (for instance, through committing murder, thereby forfeiting the right to life)."

Morality underpins all legal systems, evident in how laws inherently make moral assertions about what is preferable or not, including minutiae like speed limits, as morality guides judgments on what is better or worse, thereby elucidating an end goal or addressing the question "what ought to be”. While all sins may be equal in the eyes of God, I maintain that on Earth, a hierarchy exists for the punishment of crimes. This hierarchy prioritizes the gravest offenses, particularly those infringing upon fundamental rights (with the right to life being paramount), while lesser offenses are viewed in relation to the rights stemming from these foundational principles.

Morality cannot exist independently of God (not to suggest that a non-religious individual cannot exhibit moral behavior, but rather that "morality" lacks substance without a divine foundation). Morality delineates objectives, necessitating an external source to define it, as opposed to reducing morality to merely achieving certain goals, which fundamentally underpins its essence.

It is the duty of man to find and spread the truth, animated by love towards their fellow man.

Nationalism is an extension of filial piety. Just as children are expected to care for their parents in their old age, so too should one care for his nation. Like family members who rely on each other for support, citizens rely on their fellow countrymen to uphold shared values, defend against external threats, and promote the nation's interests. Filial piety emphasizes the interconnectedness of family members and the importance of mutual support and solidarity. Similarly, nationalism fosters a sense of unity and cohesion among citizens, promoting cooperation and individual action for the common good across society's vast expanse.

An important part of rights is the fact that they are from God and bestowed only upon humans. Animals do not have rights. Animals do not have freewill. Animals do not have a moral conscience. God placed man above animals. To even insinuate that animals have rights is on the path to the complete destruction of human rights.

Freedom:

Freedom arises due to virtue, vice, and free will. Freedom is not “The freedom to do what you want” but “The freedom to do what you ought.” True freedom arises from discipline and truth. One’s will is weakened when taking part in vice; it lowers one's ability to reason and enslaves them to vice. Part of Freedom is how much opportunity one for good one has and how much choice one has in his opportunities. One is most free when one is righteous. “The freedom to do what you want” is like being able to lock oneself in prison; how free are you when you actually get in that cell? Locking oneself in a prison of unchecked desires ultimately leads to bondage rather than freedom. It enslaves individuals to their base instincts, impeding their capacity for rational judgment and moral agency. In this state, individuals become prisoners of their own impulses, unable to pursue higher goods or achieve true fulfillment. Are you free if you are allowed to be into bondage? If something undermines the capacity of the will it is an enslaving force, so no.

Enslavement is a state in which individuals are bound or restricted by various forces that impede their capacity for rational judgment, moral agency, and the pursuit of higher goods. There are different ways in which one can be enslaved, some are:
Enslavement to Vice and Base Instincts
This enslavement occurs when individuals allow themselves to be driven by their base instincts, such as selfishness, greed, lust, or addiction. In this state, individuals become prisoners of their own impulses, unable to exercise self-control or make rational choices
Enslavement to External Influences
Enslavement can also manifest in individuals being unjustly, unduly, perversely  influenced or controlled by external factors, such as unjust societal norms, unjust cultural pressures, or oppressive systems. When individuals are unable to exercise autonomy and agency due to external constraints or coercion, they are effectively enslaved by these forces.
Enslavement to Falsehood and Deception
Another form of enslavement is Another form of enslavement discussed in Lord Thompson's philosophy is the bondage individuals experience when they are deceived or misled by falsehoods or illusions. This enslavement occurs when individuals are unable to discern truth from falsehood, leading them to make decisions or act in ways that are contrary to their own well-being.
Enslavement to Ignorance
Enslavement can also result from ignorance or lack of knowledge. When individuals are unaware of their true nature, purpose, or potential, they are bound by limited perception and incomplete will that may prevent them from realizing their full freedom and potential.

Freedom will most likely be stifled by subtle means, such as that depicted in "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley. The smart tyrant enslaves people with vice so that they may never know they’re enslaved. Language is the way we think, and you can change language to change how people think. This can be used as a way to control the masses. “!984” touches on this a bit with “Newspeak,” The tyrant will use this to stop people from being able to think in opposition to him.

Ontology:
Things exist in an order based on fundamentals; all prerequisites must exist before anything can emerge from them. God has to have existed before everything, as everything has to come from Him, and He needs no prerequisites. From God naturally arise His emergent principles, those being of the nature of truth and morality.
 
"Which waffle came first, the food or the pattern?
 The waffle has many prerequisites (grain, heat, water, baking powder, eggs), but the pattern has no prerequisites other than material existence (being true) itself, so it comes first."

Most things are not made or conceived but found, discovered, or actualized. When one thinks up a thought or concept, they were not the first to come up with it, as God, all-knowing, all-processing, all-original, would have 'had' these ideas as soon as principles were in place for them to be able to be. As soon as a possibility arose, he 'thought' it. And as though God, all things are possible; he's thought everything that could ever be. Let’s say a new statue was erected, the possibility was there and was thought of due to God. All the possible plans were already dreamt up. Nothing happened but that an idea that was already, was discovered by man and then actualized. Nikola Tesla grappled with this concept saying, “My brain is only a receiver, in the Universe there is a core from which we obtain knowledge, strength and inspiration. I have not penetrated into the secrets of this core, but I know that it exists.”
Clarification: Most ideas or concepts are not newly created but rather already exist in some form, waiting to be discovered or brought into reality. God as an all-knowing and all-original entity, would have already conceived every possible idea as soon as the principles for them to exist were in place. When humans think of something new, they are not the originators but rather tapping into a pre-existing pool of possibilities that God has already envisioned. The example of erecting a new statue illustrates this concept. The possibility of creating the statue was already present due to God having thought of all possible plans beforehand. Therefore, when humans bring the idea into reality, they are merely actualizing something that was already within the realm of possibility, previously conceived by God.

Reality is objective; every statement can be judged to be true or false ultimately, though not by man. Man is a finite being and so are his perceptions. Objectivity knows no bounds including seemingly subjective matters. Due to the differences between men as subjects, Reality can have different applications.

Both literal and metaphorical ways of understanding reality provide insights on to reality and both have the potential to be true. Literal reality refers to the tangible, empirical world perceived through the senses. It encompasses physical phenomena, empirical observations, and objective truths grounded in the material realm. Literal reality provides the foundation for scientific inquiry, empirical knowledge, and practical understanding of the physical universe. Metaphorical reality extends beyond the confines of empirical observation, delving into the realm of symbolism, allegory, and interpretation. It encompasses abstract concepts, symbolic representations, and metaphorical constructs that convey deeper truths beyond surface appearances. Even things like “the earth is at the center of the solar system” & “the earth is flat” can be true even if literally false. The earth is flat when it comes to living your everyday life, your view of where you are is practically a flat world. The earth is at the center of the universe and of reality as it is where man is and man is where metaphysical and physical realities meet and it is where the story of all of us takes place. While literal descriptions of natural phenomena provide factual information about the physical world, metaphorical narratives and allegorical interpretations convey deeper insights into the symbolic significance of these phenomena and their broader implications for human experience.
Social Philosophy:

As François de La Rochefoucauld said, “Hypocrisy is the tribute that vice pays to virtue.” Hypocrites say what they say because they know it is right, even though they say one thing but do another.

Man is not independent but interdependent. Man is a coupling creature, relying on more than himself. A man relies upon a spouse, children, family, friends, faith, God, belief, meaning, and purpose (to name a few). Where you can find meaning and purpose is where you’ll find a part of what you rely on. Another component is the things that help you along the way and get you there.

You can see this interdependence in spouses, especially later in life when one dies, the other one usually follows soon after, with even one year being common.

Even a 'private' vice can affect you. If a man is an alcoholic, does it affect you? Well, yes, it might not affect you directly that he’s in the pub all the time, but it can start when he comes home late, is absent with their children, and maybe even abuses them. It affects you when he’s less effective at work. And what is a society but a collection of people? If a man’s community and household is righteous then the man is more likely to be righteous. If a man’s community and household is perverse then the man is more likely to be perverse. So, the individual is a fundamental part of society, and society is a fundamental part of the individual.

The elite in society have a duty to be the best they can be and to serve as role models for everyone else, regardless of their background. The elite should exemplify the highest moral standards and dignity. The ruling class should ideally be composed of individuals from the elite, provided they meet the necessary criteria. However, it's also essential for the common man to have representatives. The elite, along with the ruling class, should face rigorous scrutiny to ensure they fulfill their duties. Elite status should not be determined solely by birthright unless there exists a powerless political monarchy that primarily serves as a cultural force. Rather, it should be accessible to anyone capable of attaining such a level. To be clear the elite are not arbiters of morality but merely to be held to the highest of standards, while still making room for natural human fallenness. The elite are to compose themselves with dignity and grace at all times.

There are both masculine and feminine virtues. Some masculine virtues include assertiveness, leadership, stoicism, competitiveness, and dominance. Some feminine virtues include nurturance, sensitivity, sweetness, supportiveness, gentleness, warmth, and beauty. Masculine and feminine virtues are complementary and equally important and valuable. Of course, there are common virtues, but the differences between the sexes imply different applications. A poem that sheds light on feminine virtue (and one that I rather enjoy) is 'The Hand That Rocks The Cradle Is The Hand That Rules The World' by William Ross Wallace. Mothers possess decisive influence on the future direction of society as they raise and nurture the next generation. Some common virtues are integrity, compassion, courage, wisdom, justice, resilience, gratitude, humility, stewardship, generosity, faithfulness, temperance, and forgiveness.

Metaphysics:

There are 3 Transcendentals: Truth, Goodness, & Beauty. These transcendentals are interconnected. Whatever is good is likely to be true and beautiful. Whatever is true is likely to be good and beautiful. Whatever is beautiful is likely to be good and true.

Reality, whether physical or metaphysical, is grounded in God

Man is body & soul. Man cannot exist independently of either. For the reason that man is body and soul, man’s mind is the meeting point of two worlds. One world physical, one world metaphysical. Man; for this reason, is the center of the universe for all intents and purposes.

Evil makes perversions of anything and everything.

Marriage:

Marriage is the structure that allows for a love so real that it creates new life. Marriage is an institution not created by man but by God and principle; thus, man cannot change the definition of marriage, perhaps of the word 'marriage,' but not of the institution itself. Marriage, in principle, is about procreation; it regulates the obligations and responsibilities attendant on procreation. In principle, where procreation is impossible, marriage is inapplicable. To clarify, this would not exclude people who are beyond child-bearing age because anomalies do not necessarily redefine the core identity or characteristics of something. But where procreation in principle is impossible, such as between a man and a man or a woman and a woman, marriage is not applicable even despite man's efforts. Another aspect of marriage is that it is the way to reconcile the complementary nature and differences of the sexes.

Marriage is a Christian/Jewish Institution and should be recognized as such. The government has no place in marriage directly. The government has the right and responsibility to establish civil unions but not to give out marriages. Marriage refers to the concept espoused in the bible thus it is uniquely Christian/Jewish and what is now commonly referred to as marriage is actually usually merely civil union.

Epistemology:

Knowledge has its foundation in divine truth, originating from God as the ultimate source of all reality. God's omniscience ensures the absolute certainty and validity of knowledge, serving as the bedrock upon which all other forms of knowledge rest. Divine revelation is a means of acquiring knowledge. Reason serves as a valuable tool for interpreting and elucidating divine truths, complementing and reinforcing the insights derived from revelation. There exists intuitive knowledge or inner knowing, which transcends purely rational or empirical modes of understanding. Intuition, guided by divine inspiration or the moral conscience, provides immediate insights into truths that may elude rational analysis. There is a hierarchy of knowledge, with divine revelation occupying the highest level of certainty and authority. Empirical observation, rational inquiry, and intuitive insights are considered valuable but subordinate to divine truth, subject to scrutiny and interpretation in light of revealed knowledge. Faith and reason are complementary facets of a unified epistemological framework, working in tandem to illuminate different aspects of reality and enhance our understanding of divine truth. Truths in one domain complement and reinforce truths in others, different facets of knowledge converge to form a comprehensive understanding of existence. Human creativity and ingenuity are processes of actualizing pre-existing possibilities envisioned by God. Innovations and discoveries are thus manifestations of divine inspiration. Faith is a virtue, by which the intellect, by movement of the will, assents to the supernatural truths of Revelation, not on the motive of intrinsic evidence, but on the sole ground of the infallible authority of God revealing.
There are four core ways for a man to think, constructive thinking, critical thinking, empirical thinking, and interpretive thinking. Constructive thinking essentially is having a pool of knowledge and from that creating new knowledge and insight. Another way to put it is that constructive thinking entails taking knowledge already known and extrapolating new knowledge. Constructive thinking involves creativity, reflection, problem-solving, adaptability, and inspiration. Constructive thinking is most important for actually coming up with new ideas. Critical thinking is the breaking down of ideas into parts deemed true. Critical thinking is about judgment, analysis, and comparison. Critical thinking involves analysis, evaluation, interpretation, and objectivity. Critical thinking is most important for judging ideas. Empirical thinking is grounded in systematic observation and data collection, constituting the foundational steps in the pursuit of knowledge. It entails the methodical gathering of raw information from the natural world through direct sensory experiences, controlled experimentation, or other rigorous means of data acquisition. This empirical data serves as the bedrock for subsequent analysis and interpretation. Empirical thinking is used in the identification of meaningful patterns, trends, or relationships within observed phenomena. Through empirical thinking, individuals engage in a process of disciplined inquiry. Empirical thinking involves skills like observational skills, quantitative reasoning, precision, scientific literacy, data interpretation, and experimental design. Interpretive thinking is taking known knowledge and being able to transfer it between different frameworks (of any kind). It may also involve recontextualizing knowledge. Another part of interpretive thinking is modification (which plays heavily into implantation of knowledge). Interpretive thinking involves reflection, modification, adaptability, meta-cognition, etc. Interpretive thinking is most important for implantation of known knowledge.	Specialized applications and combinations of these lead to specialized thought systems; for example, metacognitive thinking, emotional thinking, strategic thinking, etc.

Aphorisms, practical insights, & misc:
 
The root for every idea in this text stems from one idea, which is, “God is the ultimate source and sustainer of existence”

An easy formula for the view on reality is an overarching objective reality with diverging subjective interpretations and applications

A follower of this philosophy would be called a “Grand Intentionalist”

Job of the philosopher:  
Akin to a polyhedron, Truth is multifaceted. Like forming a planar net, the philosopher reconciles the apparent contradictions of Truth.

The ideas you should be most scared of are your own. One of the scariest, “to act.” Its terrifying equal, “to not act.”

Your mind is how you interact with reality. You can tune it to be in focus or you can distort focus, but you can only tune it in full. If something is out of focus the whole thing is a bit blurred.

People who naturally possess things like skills, talents, intelligence, imagination, focus; possess gifts are from the lord himself and it is our duty to take care of and use them"

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

The Philosophy of Grand Intentionality, as expounded by Gabriel Thompson, delves into the complexities of existence, morality, politics, and more through a Christian lens. The interconnectedness of beauty, goodness, and truth serves as a guiding principle in this philosophy, highlighting the objective nature of beauty and its manifestations. Thompson delves into the aesthetics of beauty, exploring the metaphysical aspects of creation and the allure of true beauty in a world tainted by moral depravity. The political philosophy proposed by Thompson envisions an ideal form of government, blending elements of oligarchy, constitutionalism, and democracy to establish a system of governance rooted in moral principles and checks and balances.

The concept of freedom in Thompson's philosophy extends beyond mere autonomy, emphasizing the importance of discipline, virtue, and the pursuit of what one ought to do rather than simply what one desires to do. Thompson explores the various forms of enslavement that can constrain individuals, from vice and base instincts to external influences and deception, shedding light on the subtle ways in which freedom can be stifled.

Thompson delves into the ontology of reality, positing that all things exist in an ordered fashion based on fundamentals, with God as the ultimate source of authority. The interconnected relationship between God, reality, and humanity is explored, highlighting the inherent interdependence between body and soul, finite beings and the infinite essence of God.

The epistemological foundations of knowledge in Thompson's philosophy are grounded in divine truth, with faith and reason serving as complementary facets of a unified epistemological framework. The role of intuition, critical thinking, and empirical observation in acquiring knowledge is explored, highlighting the importance of both objective truths and subjective interpretations in expanding one's understanding of reality.

In practical insights and aphorisms, Thompson emphasizes the importance of self-reflection, introspection, and the exploration of one's gifts and talents as gifts from the divine. The duty of the philosopher, as outlined by Thompson, is to reconcile the multifaceted nature of Truth, delving into the complexities of existence and morality with deep thought and contemplation.

Overall, the Philosophy of Grand Intentionality serves as a comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of existence, morality, politics, and more through a Christian lens, emphasizing the interconnectedness of beauty, goodness, and truth in guiding one's actions and perceptions of the world. Thompson's philosophical musings shed light on the importance of discipline, virtue, and introspection in the pursuit of true freedom and the realization of one's innate gifts and talents as reflections of divine truth.