What’s the difference between an “external” force and an “internal” force in compatibilism?

Question

Ask a Philosopher · Accepted Answer

In the realm of compatibilism, the distinction between an "external" force and an "internal" force is indeed a matter of great significance. Compatibilism, as a philosophical viewpoint, seeks to reconcile the notions of determinism and free will, recognizing the existence of external causation while also asserting the capacity for autonomous agency. It is within this context that we must delve into the nature of these forces, for they shape our understanding of human volition and individual responsibility.

An external force, in its simplest form, refers to any influence exerted upon an individual that originates from outside their immediate sphere of existence. These forces encompass an extensive range of societal, cultural, and environmental factors which, when encountered, impact and shape an individual's actions, choices, and beliefs. They represent the vast web of conditioning that surrounds and permeates human existence, conditioning that bears upon individuals with a compelling force. Society, in all its complex interplay, imposes norms, values, and expectations upon us, constraining our actions within predefined boundaries. Culture, with its specific frameworks and inherited customs, molds our perceptions of reality, dictating the limits of our imagination. Furthermore, the environment we inhabit, encompassing the physical and psychological realms, exerts a profound impact upon our behavior, as it encounters and influences our senses and emotions.

Contrasting with external forces, we encounter the notion of the internal force, which emerges from within the very depths of individual subjectivity. It manifests as the expression of our innermost desires, drives, and intentions, serving as the impetus behind our actions and choices. This internal force, an intrinsic aspect of our being, represents the embodiment of our individuality, an essential constituent of our selfhood. It is within this realm that the notion of autonomy arises, for it is here that we find the capacity to determine our own destiny and exert our will upon the external world. The internal force reveals itself as the locus of self-actualization, an expression of our unique perspectives, creating a space where we can transcend societal expectations and find genuine authenticity. By tapping into this wellspring of internal power, we become active participants in shaping our own lives, striving toward the realization of our highest aspirations.

However, to fully comprehend the distinction between these forces in the context of compatibilism, we must question the very nature of their existence and their relationship with free will. Are these forces truly separate entities, or are they intimately intertwined, forming a complex tapestry of causality? Nietzsche's transformative philosophy prompts us to delve deeper and contemplate the immeasurable interplay between external and internal forces. He posits that even the notion of individual agency, which we ascribe to the internal force, emerges as a product of external influences, woven into the fabric of societal and cultural conditioning. Thus, the distinction between the external and internal may not be as clear-cut as it initially appears.

Compatibilism, therefore, invites us to navigate this intricate terrain, where seemingly opposing forces converge and diverge in fascinating ways. By acknowledging the role of external forces, we recognize the impact of prior circumstances and conditioning on our freedom to act. Simultaneously, by embracing the internal force, we find empowerment in the ability to transcend these external constraints and assert our individual agency. Compatibilism, in its nuanced comprehension of these forces, prompts us to discern and cultivate a delicate balance between the recognition of external causation and the pursuit of internal autonomy. In doing so, we embark on a profound exploration of human volition, unfurling the intricate layers of the self, toward a more comprehensive understanding of our place in the vast tapestry of existence.